• Our Attorneys
    • Alana Yakovlev
    • Daniel Bibb
    • Ryan Blanch
    • Sumeet Sondhi
  • Tax Evasion
    • Concealment Schemes
      • Concealment with Cash
      • Corporate Concealment
      • Disguised Ownership
      • IRA Concealment
      • Offshore Concealment
      • Trust Concealment
    • Evasion by filing a False Tax Return
    • Evasion of Payment
    • Failure to File
    • Obstruction of the IRS
      • Creating a tax evasion scheme
      • Harrassing and Intimidating the IRS
      • Impeding an IRS investigation in order to avoid taxes
      • Using the IRS to Harass a Third Party
    • Penalties and Prosecution
    • Tax Avoidance
      • Employer Withholding Tax Evasion
      • Failure to file an FBAR
    • Tax Evasion and Defenses
    • The Law and Prosecution
    • The Non-Filer Program
    • Third Party Liability for Tax Evasion
      • Preparing a false or fraudulent tax return on behalf of another
      • Promotion of Tax Fraud
    • Totals and Current News
      • Pedro Espada, Despite Last-Ditch Attack on Judge, Convicted of Embezzlement, Tax Evasion
  • Fraudulent Practices
    • Bankruptcy Fraud
      • Evasion through Bankruptcy Fraud
    • Filing False Business Deductions
    • Foreign Accounts
    • Identity Theft
    • Illegal Income
      • Tax Evasion and Criminal Liability
    • IRS Operational Priorities: Counterterrorism Financing
    • Misrepresentation of Workforce
    • Sales Tax Evasion
    • Structuring
    • Tax Settlement Scams
    • The IRS’ ‘Dirty Dozen’
    • Transferring assets
  • IRS Summons
  • Related Crimes
    • Recent Cases
      • 10th Circuit makes it harder to pay defense attorneys in tax fraud cases
      • 2nd Circuit decision provides slight hope for defendants accused of conspiracy to evade taxes
      • 5th Circuit rules that statute of limitations begins to run as late as the last act of tax evasion
      • 5th Circuit ruling supports expansive view of illegal income for sentencing enhancement
      • 6th Circuit limits the use of illegal income sentencing enhancement for tax evasion
      • 9th Circuit expands the applicability of the sophisticated means sentencing enhancement
  • Staff
    • Emel McDowell
  • Tax Crime Defenses
    • Absence of a Deficiency
    • Amendment of Return
    • Cash Hoard Defense
    • Fatal Variance Defense
    • Selective Prosecution
    • Tax Defenses that Rarely Work
    • The Inability to Pay Defense
    • The Mistake of Law
    • The Third Party Defense
    • Willfulness
  • Tax Crime Sentencing
    • Adjustments
    • Criminal History Category
    • Offense Level
  • Tax Fraud Generally
    • Prosecuting Tax Fraud Cases
    • Recent Cases in the News

646-808-3345

  • About Us
  • Recent Tax Cases
    • Federal Cases
    • 2nd Circuit
    • 5th Circuit
    • 5th Circuit
    • 6th Circuit
    • 9th Circuit
  • IRS Subpoenas
  • Case Results
  • BLF in the News
  • Contact Us
     
This jQuery slider was created with the free EasyRotator for WordPress plugin from DWUser.com.

OK
  • The IRS’ ‘Dirty Dozen’
  • Third Party Liability for Tax Evasion
  • Failure to File
  • Filing False Business Deductions
  • Promotion of Tax Fraud
  • Identity Theft
  • Structuring
  • Creating a tax evasion scheme
  • Impeding an IRS investigation in order to avoid taxes


Preparing a false or fraudulent tax return on behalf of another


Completing tax forms is never fun, and many people would rather have someone else do it.  So it’s no surprise that there are lucrative careers available for accountants and tax attorneys who help individuals and businesses file their tax forms and pay their taxes.  These professionals also assist clients in maximizing their refunds and minimizing the amount of taxes owed to the government.  As long as an accountant or attorney doesn’t advise his client to break the law, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

But a tax preparer (tax preparer is the language that the IRS uses for anyone who prepares someone else’s return) who advises a client to break the law or to file a false statement is just as vulnerable to criminal prosecution as the taxpayer.  None of the criminal statutes in the Internal Revenue Code require that the taxpayer be the actor.  26 USC § 7201, clearly states that it covers “Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax” (emphasis added), meaning that attempting to evade or defeat the tax of another is just as illegal as evading your own income taxes.  Likewise, laws against making false statements prohibit the conduct regardless of whether or not the statements were made on the individuals own tax filings.

In fact, these preparers can be even more vulnerable than the taxpayer if the taxpayer innocently believed his or her conduct was legal because of the advice of the preparer.  All of these statutes require that the conduct be willful.   Consequently, proving that a trained accountant or attorney willfully violated the law can be easier to prove than the willfulness of the taxpayer who will claim that he was merely following the advice of his attorney or accountant.  So even if the taxpayer is able to convince the Internal Revenue Service of an innocent mistake or lack of understanding of the law, the preparer can be left facing substantial criminal penalties for attempting to assist the taxpayer in evading his taxes.

But willfulness can also provide a defense to a tax preparer that is not available to the taxpayer.  If the taxpayer provides false information to the preparer or misleads him, the tax preparer cannot be prosecuted merely because the taxpayer used him as a vehicle to commit tax fraud.  A preparer can only be charged under these statutes if he knowingly attempts to evade taxes or mislead the IRS.

  • Sitemap
  • Contact Us

646-808-3345

©2012 All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising | Disclaimer