• Our Attorneys
    • Alana Yakovlev
    • Daniel Bibb
    • Ryan Blanch
    • Sumeet Sondhi
  • Tax Evasion
    • Concealment Schemes
      • Concealment with Cash
      • Corporate Concealment
      • Disguised Ownership
      • IRA Concealment
      • Offshore Concealment
      • Trust Concealment
    • Evasion by filing a False Tax Return
    • Evasion of Payment
    • Failure to File
    • Obstruction of the IRS
      • Creating a tax evasion scheme
      • Harrassing and Intimidating the IRS
      • Impeding an IRS investigation in order to avoid taxes
      • Using the IRS to Harass a Third Party
    • Penalties and Prosecution
    • Tax Avoidance
      • Employer Withholding Tax Evasion
      • Failure to file an FBAR
    • Tax Evasion and Defenses
    • The Law and Prosecution
    • The Non-Filer Program
    • Third Party Liability for Tax Evasion
      • Preparing a false or fraudulent tax return on behalf of another
      • Promotion of Tax Fraud
    • Totals and Current News
      • Pedro Espada, Despite Last-Ditch Attack on Judge, Convicted of Embezzlement, Tax Evasion
  • Fraudulent Practices
    • Bankruptcy Fraud
      • Evasion through Bankruptcy Fraud
    • Filing False Business Deductions
    • Foreign Accounts
    • Identity Theft
    • Illegal Income
      • Tax Evasion and Criminal Liability
    • IRS Operational Priorities: Counterterrorism Financing
    • Misrepresentation of Workforce
    • Sales Tax Evasion
    • Structuring
    • Tax Settlement Scams
    • The IRS’ ‘Dirty Dozen’
    • Transferring assets
  • IRS Summons
  • Related Crimes
    • Recent Cases
      • 10th Circuit makes it harder to pay defense attorneys in tax fraud cases
      • 2nd Circuit decision provides slight hope for defendants accused of conspiracy to evade taxes
      • 5th Circuit rules that statute of limitations begins to run as late as the last act of tax evasion
      • 5th Circuit ruling supports expansive view of illegal income for sentencing enhancement
      • 6th Circuit limits the use of illegal income sentencing enhancement for tax evasion
      • 9th Circuit expands the applicability of the sophisticated means sentencing enhancement
  • Staff
    • Emel McDowell
  • Tax Crime Defenses
    • Absence of a Deficiency
    • Amendment of Return
    • Cash Hoard Defense
    • Fatal Variance Defense
    • Selective Prosecution
    • Tax Defenses that Rarely Work
    • The Inability to Pay Defense
    • The Mistake of Law
    • The Third Party Defense
    • Willfulness
  • Tax Crime Sentencing
    • Adjustments
    • Criminal History Category
    • Offense Level
  • Tax Fraud Generally
    • Prosecuting Tax Fraud Cases
    • Recent Cases in the News

646-808-3345

  • About Us
  • Recent Tax Cases
    • Federal Cases
    • 2nd Circuit
    • 5th Circuit
    • 5th Circuit
    • 6th Circuit
    • 9th Circuit
  • IRS Subpoenas
  • Case Results
  • BLF in the News
  • Contact Us
     
This jQuery slider was created with the free EasyRotator for WordPress plugin from DWUser.com.

OK
  • The IRS’ ‘Dirty Dozen’
  • Third Party Liability for Tax Evasion
  • Failure to File
  • Filing False Business Deductions
  • Promotion of Tax Fraud
  • Identity Theft
  • Structuring
  • Creating a tax evasion scheme
  • Impeding an IRS investigation in order to avoid taxes


Evasion of Payment


The first crime under the Internal Revenue Code is 26 USC § 7201, “attempt to evade or defeat tax.”  On the surface, the language of this statute is straightforward and simple:  “Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony.” But a careful examination of the statute will reveal that it doesn’t merely create one crime but actually creates two distinct crimes: attempts to evade assessment and attempts to evade payment of taxes.  Evading payment is also a crime under 26 USC § 7203, “willful failure to file return, supply information, or pay tax.”

We have already covered numerous instances of how the IRS prosecutes those who attempt to avoid taxes either by concealing income, falsely reporting expenses, making false statements in tax filings or failing to report income or assets.  But many of these same methods are also means by which taxpayers will attempt to evade payment of taxes.  The principal difference between evading assessment and evading payment is that while those that evade assessment are concealing assets before taxes are assessed, those accused of evading payment have typically concealed assets after an assessment by the IRS.  Other than this key difference, many of the same activities and schemes are involved in both crimes.  The key difference is timing.

While violating the Internal Revenue Code is never advised, evading payment can be even more problematic than merely attempting to evade assessment.  While the IRS may not be alerted to taxpayers who attempt to conceal income to avoid assessment, the taxpayer who attempts to evade payment has already attracted the attention and energies of the IRS.  While assets may be concealed, the assessed taxes and penalties have already attracted their focus.  Evading payment is a good way for a taxpayer already accused of evading assessment to find himself prosecuted for additional offenses.  Because while a taxpayer may have committed one act to evade payment for multiple years of taxes, the IRS can prosecute each year as a separate count of tax fraud.

But the IRS cannot successfully prosecute an individual merely for failing to pay their taxes.  To prosecute an individual under either of the above statutes, the IRS must prove that the individual took some sort of affirmative act to avoid paying an assessed tax.  So without concealment of assets or sheltering funds from the IRS, an individual cannot be prosecuted for these crimes.  In other words, it’s no crime to be unable to pay or tax bill.  It’s only a crime if they prove you are able to pay the bill and refuse to do so.

 

  • Sitemap
  • Contact Us

646-808-3345

©2012 All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising | Disclaimer