• Our Attorneys
    • Alana Yakovlev
    • Daniel Bibb
    • Ryan Blanch
    • Sumeet Sondhi
  • Tax Evasion
    • Concealment Schemes
      • Concealment with Cash
      • Corporate Concealment
      • Disguised Ownership
      • IRA Concealment
      • Offshore Concealment
      • Trust Concealment
    • Evasion by filing a False Tax Return
    • Evasion of Payment
    • Failure to File
    • Obstruction of the IRS
      • Creating a tax evasion scheme
      • Harrassing and Intimidating the IRS
      • Impeding an IRS investigation in order to avoid taxes
      • Using the IRS to Harass a Third Party
    • Penalties and Prosecution
    • Tax Avoidance
      • Employer Withholding Tax Evasion
      • Failure to file an FBAR
    • Tax Evasion and Defenses
    • The Law and Prosecution
    • The Non-Filer Program
    • Third Party Liability for Tax Evasion
      • Preparing a false or fraudulent tax return on behalf of another
      • Promotion of Tax Fraud
    • Totals and Current News
      • Pedro Espada, Despite Last-Ditch Attack on Judge, Convicted of Embezzlement, Tax Evasion
  • Fraudulent Practices
    • Bankruptcy Fraud
      • Evasion through Bankruptcy Fraud
    • Filing False Business Deductions
    • Foreign Accounts
    • Identity Theft
    • Illegal Income
      • Tax Evasion and Criminal Liability
    • IRS Operational Priorities: Counterterrorism Financing
    • Misrepresentation of Workforce
    • Sales Tax Evasion
    • Structuring
    • Tax Settlement Scams
    • The IRS’ ‘Dirty Dozen’
    • Transferring assets
  • IRS Summons
  • Related Crimes
    • Recent Cases
      • 10th Circuit makes it harder to pay defense attorneys in tax fraud cases
      • 2nd Circuit decision provides slight hope for defendants accused of conspiracy to evade taxes
      • 5th Circuit rules that statute of limitations begins to run as late as the last act of tax evasion
      • 5th Circuit ruling supports expansive view of illegal income for sentencing enhancement
      • 6th Circuit limits the use of illegal income sentencing enhancement for tax evasion
      • 9th Circuit expands the applicability of the sophisticated means sentencing enhancement
  • Staff
    • Emel McDowell
  • Tax Crime Defenses
    • Absence of a Deficiency
    • Amendment of Return
    • Cash Hoard Defense
    • Fatal Variance Defense
    • Selective Prosecution
    • Tax Defenses that Rarely Work
    • The Inability to Pay Defense
    • The Mistake of Law
    • The Third Party Defense
    • Willfulness
  • Tax Crime Sentencing
    • Adjustments
    • Criminal History Category
    • Offense Level
  • Tax Fraud Generally
    • Prosecuting Tax Fraud Cases
    • Recent Cases in the News

646-808-3345

  • About Us
  • Recent Tax Cases
    • Federal Cases
    • 2nd Circuit
    • 5th Circuit
    • 5th Circuit
    • 6th Circuit
    • 9th Circuit
  • IRS Subpoenas
  • Case Results
  • BLF in the News
  • Contact Us
     
This jQuery slider was created with the free EasyRotator for WordPress plugin from DWUser.com.

OK
  • The IRS’ ‘Dirty Dozen’
  • Third Party Liability for Tax Evasion
  • Failure to File
  • Filing False Business Deductions
  • Promotion of Tax Fraud
  • Identity Theft
  • Structuring
  • Creating a tax evasion scheme
  • Impeding an IRS investigation in order to avoid taxes


Tax Settlement Scams


These scams offer tax relief to those who owe heavy debts to the IRS.  The scammers usually promise to settle the debt for pennies on the dollar.  However, in reality, these scammers usually are only promising to prepare an offer in compromise (OIC). An effort that has little chance for success and can be completed by the taxpayer himself without any assistance by settlement agency.

An OIC is an agreement between the taxpayer and the IRS in which the IRS promises to accept less money than is owed due to extenuating circumstances.  According to the IRS, an OIC will be accepted if and only if the amount offered by the taxpayer is equal or greater than the reasonable collection potential.  This agreement entails revealing the taxpayers entire financial picture to the IRS.  Still, the IRS, tends only to accept OICs in extreme circumstances.  As a result, the IRS reportedly rejects 75% of OICs.

Tax settlement firms that prepare OICs for their clients offer no advantage in having taxes forgiven.  In fact, if a taxpayer can afford to hire one of these firms they generally have a small chance of getting an OIC approved in the first place.  Furthermore, preparing an OIC can actually hurt indebted taxpayers since it prevents them from disputing underlying liability.  Regardless, taxpayers should be able to prepare an OIC by themselves.  Those who fall prey to the scam can lose thousands of dollars in return for basically nothing.

As of now, some tax settlement scammers have escaped regulation.  In the past, some of these scammers have been charged with unlawfully misrepresenting or overstating their ability to reduce tax debts.  Still, those scammed often stand little chance of redeeming payments.

  • Sitemap
  • Contact Us

646-808-3345

©2012 All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising | Disclaimer